Brief の概要

前に戻る

Lego

セクター: 子供用品

企業: Lego

The LEGO brand is more than simply our familiar logo. It is the expectations that people have of the company – towards its products and services, and the accountability that the LEGO Group feels towards the world around it. The brand acts as a guarantee of quality and originality.

www.lego.com

すべてのピッチ

手順について指示を受ける

共和国の選択

  • Icon for Grom

    ブランド: GROM - Il gelato come una volta
    セクター: 食料品
    カテゴリー: デザイン : ロゴ

    予算: $3 200

    締め切り: 27.03.2010 23:59 GMT

    Brief の言語: イタリア語, 英語
    ソリューションの言語: イタリア語, スペイン語, フランス語, 英語
    ソリューションの番号: 414

    公表済み 25.02.10 13:45 GMT

最高予算 Brief

  • 0

    Restyling - IP Lubricants range

    ブランド: IP gruppo api
    カテゴリー: デザイン : パッケージング
    予算: $5 340

    締め切り: 11.04.2010 23:59 GMT

    Brief の言語: イタリア語, 英語
    ソリューションの言語: イタリア語, 英語
    ソリューションの番号: 1

    公表済み 18.03.10 10:20 GMT

BootB Passport

BootB共和国の市民であるだけでなく、BootBパスポートを持ちたいと思いませんか?

さらに詳しく… 

グローバルでバイラルな「レゴ」ブランドキ ャンペーン

公表済み 27.11.07 12:00 GMT
230 合計
カテゴリー: Above The Line : ネット; 特定の創造物 : Viral advertising
締め切り: 31.03.2008 23:59 GMT

予算: $10 800
ステータス: 完了

ソリューションの言語: 英語
勝者: bqui

あなたの Blackboard に追加

Attachment

Gentlegiant

31.03.08 01:08 GMT

I can't attach my file!!!
Cant Tell If my solution published

PermafrostProductions

30.03.08 22:01 GMT

II published but cannot tell if it "took"
Attachment worked on retry

vickivanv

30.03.08 21:32 GMT

I retried it and the attachment worked finally. Even then, the solution posted twice simultaneously, once with the attachment and once without. Sorry for the two extra solutions without attachments!
Attachment didnt make it

vickivanv

30.03.08 20:50 GMT

My attachment didn't make it in, so I'll just post it here, in case you might be able to use it. Thanks--

LEGO BOWL

The Lego Bowl is a viral campaign taking the form of a video competition. Kids build a Lego structure and attempt to “bowl” it over with something heavy being rolled into it. This could be a bowling ball, melon, globe or any other quasi-spherical object.

Rule 1: the object must be rolled into the structure (not thrown, catapulted, etc.).

Rule 2: nothing must be damaged or destroyed in the process of making the video (that goes for any buildings, homes, personal property, land/landscaping, legos, and yes—even the bowling ball or bowling ball-alternative.

Rule 4: no profanity or any arguably adult or offensive material, such issues to be decided solely by Lego.com.

Rule 5: entrants must post their videos to YouTube.com or a similarly open video-sharing site by a date set by Lego.

Rule 6: by that same date, the entrant must send enter the link to the video on a contest entry page on the Lego.com, along with all permissions necessary to post the link on Lego.com and any necessary consent forms to participate in the contest (to be determined by Lego counsel).

(Optional) Rule 7: Lego.com may impose age limitations on those who can collect prizes, although it would be simpler and probably just as well to leave the age range open.

Suggestion to entrants: prominently feature in the video the written or spoken words “Vote for this video on Lego.com!” so people will know where to look.

To start the campaign, Lego might post a few contest videos with funny examples of Lego-bowling on Lego.com.

Lego.com puts up a very simple entry page (prominently linked on the Lego.com home page) for people to enter their video links and to check any necessary consent forms.

Lego.com also does a burst of targeted traditional advertising on Nick, Cartoon Network, and some specific websites—leaning heavily toward gaming sites.

Lego.com allows entries up to a certain date, and then throws open the voting for a period of a month, with up-to-the-minute stats posted.

Voting can be across a broad number of categories, but there should be three top prizes, which should be large—ie, in the thousands of dollars for the top prize, at least, so as to get the buzz going on the internet. Other categories could be things like “the architect award” – for most impressive structural integrity in the face of impact, “best production values,” “best use of sound effects,” “best use of music,” “ most creative bowling ball alternative,” “funniest video,” etc. There could be many of these with a variety of prizes, Lego-related, electronic, monetary or otherwise, as suits Lego.com.

There are a variety of ways the voting could be handled, but it should probably be a method compatible with a large number of entries.

At the end of the voting period, Lego.com can post the winners, and allow them to post and file acceptance speeches, followed by transmission of the prizes.

Lego.com can also then promote the winning videos via congratulatory videos on its site and other sites demographically weighted toward the campaign’s target audience.
Attachments - clarifying

RenF

30.03.08 15:29 GMT

BTW, if you are receiving the files and only the confirmation process is bugged, please aknowledge this and understand that there may be two identical solutions sent by two different accounts - which is my case, in which my creative partner has tried several times to send out solution, failed, and asked me to try using my account - only to fail too...